<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conspiracy Theory &#187; National Enquirer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conspiracytheory.itsverycool.com/tag/national-enquirer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conspiracytheory.itsverycool.com</link>
	<description>Just because you&#039;re paranoid doesn’t mean someone isn’t out to get you!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:48:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin Affair National Enquirer</title>
		<link>http://conspiracytheory.itsverycool.com/sarah-palin-affair-national-enquirer/presidential-elections/2008/09/04/</link>
		<comments>http://conspiracytheory.itsverycool.com/sarah-palin-affair-national-enquirer/presidential-elections/2008/09/04/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[presidential elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Enquirer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin affair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conspiracytheory.itsverycool.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right is quick to blame the Obama campaign for rumors that Sarah Palin had an affair with her husband’s business partner. They are basing this on less evidence then the Enquirer? More coming on this story...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right is quick to blame the Obama campaign for rumors that Sarah Palin had an affair with her husband’s business partner.  They are basing this on less evidence then the Enquirer? More coming on this story&#8230;<br />
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-8807756099958051";
google_ad_slot = "3089645828";
google_ad_width = 234;
google_ad_height = 60;
//--></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://conspiracytheory.itsverycool.com/sarah-palin-affair-national-enquirer/presidential-elections/2008/09/04/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

