911 Revisited:False Flag Video
By admin | September 11, 2008
Topics: 911, False flag | No Comments »
Say it Aint So Sarah: Sarah Palin Tells Three Bold Lies
By Dorian Hail | September 10, 2008
Sarah Palin Launches her campaign for vice president with at least three bold lies in her speech at the republican convention.
Lie 1. We have all heard her pronouncements about the bridge to nowhere “thanks, but no thanks”. Well after it had received its infamous name Sarah Palin was still supporting it. And the money, she kept it in the State budget, all $25.7 million. Where did it end up? In the Gravina Access Highway Project, a 3.2 mile road to nowhere.
Lie 2. She fired the Governors personal Chef Stefani Marnon. Or did she? It appears the governors personal chef was simply shifted around, while staying on the state payroll. First, she was assigned as a constituent relations assistant’ in the governor’s office and later to the state museum, finally at the Legislative Lounge where she went back to cooking.
Lie 3. The very down to earth and folksy governor told us this wonderful story about how this little old hockey mom sold the Governors plane, Westwind II on EBAY. Well, she didn’t. While it was briefly listed on EBAY, Palin hired a jet broker – Turbo North Aviation in Anchorage – which sold the jet for $2.1 million to an Alaskan businessman at a $600.000.00 loss, through Turbo North Aviation. Good work Sarah.
This was her first formal address to the American people, she is a disgrace.
Topics: presidential elections | No Comments »
Sarah Palin Affair National Enquirer
By admin | September 4, 2008
The right is quick to blame the Obama campaign for rumors that Sarah Palin had an affair with her husband’s business partner. They are basing this on less evidence then the Enquirer? More coming on this story…
Topics: presidential elections | No Comments »
Sarah Palin Delivers, McCain’s Gamble Pays Off
By Dorian Hail | September 3, 2008
In one night Sarah Palin has turned from cypher to siren and given us a daunting demonstration of oratory skill.
In the well-crafted speech she polished her narrative, told jokes, and taunted Obama like a smarmy schoolmarm. She is a rightwing, religious ideologue who has a natural TVQ. She has put the republican party line in a package wrapped it with a bow and delivered it with a spunky smile. Be afraid; be very afraid because this woman is dangerous.
Never mind that she misrepresented Obama’s accomplishments and lied about her own. We underestimate her at our peril.
Topics: presidential elections | No Comments »
Sarah Palin Birth Certificate Conspiracy?
By Dr. Elliot Lyons | September 2, 2008
Why would Sarah Palin go all the way back to Mat-Su Regional Medical Center in Alaska to deliver a premature down syndrome baby?
There is no medical reason, by any measure, that you would risk the health of the child in this way. It is clear that her actions were reckless and irresponsible. There may be one reason to go to a country hospital where you have a long-standing relationship. Could it be to cover up the parentage of the child?
This can all be settled easily. Lets see the birth certificate. It must be part of the public record. It would have the parents names, date of birth and weight of the child.
Topics: presidential elections | No Comments »
Rove and the October Surprise, or Georgia on my Mind
By Dorian Hail | August 18, 2008
By Dorian Hail
Karl Rove and the October Surprise, or Georgia on my Mind
Who would benefit from heating up the cold war three months before the presidential election? My guess would be McCain.
I first thought that the polor shift with all things Russian was just another example of the corrupt and incompetent Bush administration. After all this would be a perfect time for Russia to assert itself. Putin is no friend of the west, still angry at the way Russia has been treated since the fall of the Soviet Union. He dreams of restoring Russia’s past glory. What better time then three months before an election with an ineffective lame duck president at the helm? Added to that Saakashvili have given Putin the perfect excuse to walk into Georgia, considering his ill advised misadventure in the breakaway province of South Ossetia.
Georgia is a country that we have no interest in. The Europeans do and the Russian do, because of the pipeline. More important it is within what we used to call, the “Russian sphere of influence”, what better place to poke a stick in the Russian’s eye then Georgia.
Since it is my job to see a conspiracy in all things, I’m looking east. In my crystal ball I see Karl Rove whispering sweet promises in Saakashvili ear. We are your friends, we will protect you, you are a sweet democracy and we love you, “we are all Georgians now’.
Topics: presidential elections | No Comments »
Who Killed Bruce Ivins?
By Dorian Hail | August 9, 2008
It seems that no one is interested in the answer to that question. But for those few who are, we first have to ask who would benefit from his death. One obvious answer is the person or persons responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks. If the case is closed and the FBI stops looking then they get off scott free. If we believe the party line that Bruce Ivins was responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks then it is reasonable to believe that he killed himself. If on the other hand you don’t think it’s a slam-dunk, then lets take a moment to speculate.
Up to this point, who has been under investigation for this crime?
We have the usual suspects. In 2001 when the Bush administration was ratcheting up the call for war with Iraq, it was convenient to have us believe that the anthrax attacks were a product of an Al Qeada cell in America.
We also have a Pakistani scientist named Abdur Rauf, with alleged al-Qaeda sympathies. We like this one, Al Qaeda bad.
Then we have Stephen Hatfill who was recently paid 5.8 million taxpayer dollars for being the FBI’s “person of interest for over five years. The case against Hatfill has never been clearly articulated. What we do know is that he was writing a novel about bio terrorism. He worked for the government (recently a very dangerous job) as a bioweapons scientist.
Oddly one of the reasons that Hatfill was a suspect was that they think he believed the lethal attack would help his career and increase government funding in his area of expertise. The same motive the FBI has put on Ivins.
Well fellow conspiracy nuts that leaves us to us the US government the CIA, FBI, NSC and all those agencies that only have numbers for names. It is completely inconceivable that our government (Gulf of Tonkin) would perpetrate a crime (Valerie Plame Wilson) on its own people (Martin Luther King) in order to push a government policy (false flag).
There is no evidence that our government had anything to do with the death of one of its own scientists Dr. Bruce E. Ivins husband and father of two. There is also apparently no investigation, case closed.
Topics: 911, anthrax | No Comments »
Paul Kemp Ivins Attorney Speaks Out
By Dr. Elliot Lyons | August 8, 2008
In an interview today with Laura Sullivan on NPR Paul Kemp maintained his clients innocence. Kemp described the government’s case as “Nothing but speculation.” with no direct evidence linking his client to the crime. “We don’t” he said, “convict people on the idea that they may have exhibited eccentric behavior or that they have the opportunity to commit a crime or had the knowledge to commit a crime.”
The government’s main evidence is the particular genetic strain of Anthrax that was in a flask in Ivins possession. But kemp says that more than a hundred people had access to that flask and the same genetic strain of anthrax was sent to two other labs and used in dozens of other experiments by other scientists.
Further, throughout the investigation he never tried to hide the fact that it was the same anthrax left for seven years in the same genetic state it had been at the time the letters were sent.
Most troubling to Kemp is that there is no direct evidence that would put him in New Jersey, no to toll road or gas receipts. Seven years ago if he had been under investigation the first thing they would have done is look for evidence that he was at home.
Kemp conceded that his client struggled with mental health but that he never tried to hide it and always sought help.
For the full interview, go to NPR.
Topics: anthrax | No Comments »
The FBI’s Case Against Ivins Weak
By Dorian Hail | August 7, 2008
I have a friend who is a prosecuting attorney in New York and we discussed the evidence that was presented at today’s FBI’s news conference. He said that he ‘d be laughed out of court if he brought that to a judge, a grand jury is something else.
I asked him to be specific. What is wrong with the case? Below is my best recollection of our conversation.
Lets look at the basics, means, motive and opportunity.
Did he have the means to commit the crime? Clearly he had access to anthrax in his capacity as a senior scientist at Ft. Detrick. The new evidence supposedly connects through DNA the anthrax used in the attack to a single flask that was under Dr. Ivins control. But there are several problems with that not least among them is that fact that over a hundred other people, who the FBI claim to have eliminated, also had access to that particular strain of anthrax. Additionally the anthrax used in the attack was a highly weaponized powder. They also claim to have connected him with a piece of equipment known as a lyopholizer, that can dry the Anthrax powder, but that is not the same thing as producing a weaponized version of the anthrax. The people I’ve spoken to said that it would be very difficult for one man to have made that very sophisticated weaponized powder.
Opportunity:
They really have to stretch with this one. They have come up with the theory that because he was rebuffed by a woman 30 years ago while attending college in Cincinnati he became obsessed with her sorority Kappa Kappa Gamma, not her by the way just her sorority, and that put him within a hundred yards of where the anthrax had been mailed, in Princeton New jersey. This is really laughable on its face. But lets say he was. They still can’t place him at the scene. He would have had to drive 400 miles there and back after work. There are no witnesses that can place him at the scene and there is no physical evidence that can either. All they have is a theory and a pretty wild one at that.
Motive
We can see the first thing they have done is attack his character. He’s an alcoholic, into pornography, paranoid psychotic. See the scrawled handwritten complaint presented to the court in order to obtain a peace order.
They have come up with this one witness Jean Duley, whom I would love to have on the stand as a defense attorney. She is simply not credible.
Remember this investigation has been going on for the past 7 years his attorney Paul Kemp has said that Ivins had been interview 20 to 25 times and passed two polygraphs.
Then the FBI has said he might have committed the murders because they were about to cancel a vaccine program Ivins worked in.
There’s more but that’s the best of it, don’t worry this isn’t over.
WASHINGTON, Aug 06, 2008 /
PRNewswire-USNewswire
Following are remarks prepared for delivery by U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor at Amerithrax investigation press conference:
Good afternoon. I’m Jeff Taylor, the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. I am joined here today by Joseph Persichini, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office, Chief Postal Inspector Alexander Lazaroff, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Ken Kohl.
As the Department indicated last week and has been widely reported, substantial progress has been made in the Amerithrax investigation in recent years. As you know, this investigation into the worst act of bioterrorism in U.S. history has been one of the largest and most complex ever conducted by the FBI. The U.S. Postal Inspection Service has also made an extraordinary contribution to this investigation. Over the past seven years, hundreds of thousands of agent-hours have been dedicated to solving this crime.
Ordinarily, we do not publicly disclose evidence against a suspect who has not been charged, in part because of the presumption of innocence. But because of the extraordinary and justified public interest in this investigation, as well as the significant public attention resulting from the death of Dr. Bruce Edwards Ivins last week, today we are compelled to take the extraordinary step of providing first, the victims and their families, as well as Congress, and the American public with an overview of some recent developments as well as some of our conclusions.
Earlier today, several search warrant affidavits were unsealed in federal court in the District of Columbia. Among other things, these search warrants confirm that the government was investigating Dr. Ivins in connection with the attacks, which killed five individuals and injured 17 others in 2001. Dr. Ivins was a resident of Frederick, Maryland, and a long-time anthrax researcher who worked at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, known as USAMRIID.
Dr. Ivins died of an overdose on July 29, 2008, and, at the time of his death, was the sole suspect in the case. Our investigation had begun to shift to a particular laboratory at USAMRIID in 2005 and began to focus on Dr. Ivins as a suspect in 2007. In the weeks prior to his death, we had been in conversations with his attorneys regarding the direction of the investigation because we believed that based on the evidence we had collected, we could prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Based upon the totality of the evidence we had gathered against him, we are confident that Dr. Ivins was the only person responsible for these attacks.
We are now beginning the process of concluding this investigation. Once this process is complete, we will formally close the case. Had Dr. Ivins been indicted, he would have been presumed innocent until proven guilty as in the case with any other criminal defendant. We regret that we will not have the opportunity to present the evidence to a jury to determine whether the evidence establishes Dr. Ivins’ guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
We have provided you copies of the court documents, which give details about our evidence. I encourage you to read through them carefully.
I will summarize from these documents and then I’ll turn the podium over to the FBI to go into greater detail. I will also note that, for a variety of reasons, there may be some questions and details we may not be able to discuss publicly today. I hope you respect these boundaries, given the extraordinary steps we’re taking with this disclosure today.
Now, turning to the evidence.
First, we were able to identify in early 2005 the genetically-unique parent material of the anthrax spores used in the mailings. As the court documents allege, the parent material of the anthrax spores used in the attacks was a single flask of spores, known as “RMR-1029,” that was created and solely maintained by Dr. Ivins at USAMRIID. This means that the spores used in the attacks were taken from that specific flask, regrown, purified, dried and loaded into the letters. No one received material from that flask without going through Dr. Ivins. We thoroughly investigated every other person who could have had access to the flask and we were able to rule out all but Dr. Ivins.
Second, as a renowned expert in the production and purification of anthrax spores, Dr. Ivins was one of a handful of scientists with the capability to create spores of the concentration and purity used in the attacks. The affidavits allege that, not only did Dr. Ivins create and maintain the spore batch used in the mailings, but he also had access to and experience using a lyophilizer. A lyophilizer is a sophisticated machine that is used to dry pathogens, and can be used to dry anthrax. We know others in Dr. Ivins’ lab consulted him when they needed to use this machine.
Third, in the days leading up to each of the mailings, the documents make clear that Dr. Ivins was working inordinate hours alone at night and on the weekend in the lab where the flask of spores and production equipment were stored. A review of his access records revealed that Dr. Ivins had not spent this many “off hours” in the lab at any time before or after this period. When questioned about why he was in the lab during these off hours prior to each of the mailings, Dr. Ivins was unable to offer any satisfactory explanation.
Fourth, the affidavits indicate Dr. Ivins had engaged in behavior and made a number of statements that suggest consciousness of guilt. For example, one night shortly after a search warrant was executed on his house, Dr. Ivins took highly unusual steps to discard a book and article on DNA coding while under 24/7 surveillance. In addition, he had submitted a questionable sample of anthrax from his flask of parent spores to the FBI, presumably to mislead investigators. He had also made far-reaching efforts to blame others and divert attention away from himself, and had made threatening e-mail statements to a friend regarding the case. Recently, he had detailed threats in his group therapy session to kill people who had wronged him, after learning he might be indicted.
Fifth, as reflected in the court documents, Dr. Ivins had a history of mental health problems and was facing a difficult time professionally in the summer and fall of 2001 because an anthrax vaccine he was working on was failing. The affidavits describe one e-mail to a co-worker in which Dr. Ivins stated that he had “incredible paranoid, delusional thoughts at times,” and feared that he might not be able to control his behavior.
Sixth, throughout his adult life Dr. Ivins had frequently driven to other locations to send packages in the mail under assumed names to disguise his identity as the sender. He had also admitted to using false names and aliases in writings. In addition, he was a prolific writer to Congress and the media, the targeted victims in the anthrax attacks. Law enforcement recovered 68 letters to such entities from his house in a Nov. 1, 2007 search.
I’ll conclude with one more point. The envelopes used in the attacks were all pre-franked envelopes, sold only at U.S. Post Offices during a nine-month window in 2001. An analysis of the envelopes revealed several print defects in the ink on the pre-printed portions of the envelopes. Based on the analysis, we were able to conclude that the envelopes used in the mailings were very likely sold at a post office in the greater Frederick Maryland, area in 2001. Dr. Ivins maintained a post office box at the Post Office in Frederick, from which these pre-franked envelopes with print defects were sold.
During the course of the seven-year investigation, Dr. Ivins was interviewed by federal authorities several times — three times in 2008 alone. His statements were inconsistent over time and failed to explain the evidence against him.
The points I have just gone over are only a summary of the court documents we have provided you. There are additional details in the documents, which again, we encourage you to read thoroughly. All the information contained in this statement is now public information. I am able to give you this information because the United States followed proper procedures and formally requested that a federal court unseal several search warrants in this investigation, and that court approved the request. In addition, I consulted and received express permission of the Justice Department to do so.
I’d now like to introduce Mr. Persichini to provide you with some greater detail on the evidence and how the investigation was conducted. Thank you.
SOURCE U.S. Department of Justice
Topics: anthrax | No Comments »
The questionable case against Dr. Bruce E. Ivins
By Dorian Hail | August 6, 2008
As a mystery writer I became interested in Bruce Ivins because it sounds like he was being set up in much the same way that Stephen Hatfill had been. I started reading accounts on different blogs of the evidence that is being leaked against him and most of it appears to be specious or so circumstantial as to be meaningless. There is also evidence of that in advance of trying to sell their theory that he is the anthrax killer, they are trying to ruin his reputation, a common strategy used by law enforcement.
Planted stories by unnamed US government officials about alcohol abuse, mysterious post office boxes, pornography and an apocryphal story about a supposed obsession/fixation with Kappa Kappa Gamma Sorority dreamed up to place him in Princeton where one of the anthrax letters was mailed, along with extremely questionable players like Jean Duley often referred to as a psychoanalyst but is no more then a counselor in a drug facility with no apparent degrees of any kind. Almost none of these stories are backed up by any facts and have been talked about in the established media and on the net as though they are true.
Also, I clearly have doubts about the suicide. A dead suspect can’t defend himself against slander and can have his character destroyed with no consequences.
Last year a friend told me about the death of his sister who died because of a Tylenol overdose. Because she had long-term psychiatric problems her death was ruled a suicide . On closer investigation Tylenol can be a very dangerous drug to certain people, especially to anyone who uses alcohol, that would be more then three drinks a day. In the case of my friends sister her liver had been compromised by years of prescribed psychiatric drugs. The doses of Tylenol would not be abnormal but the effects of Tylenol on the liver can be accumulative.
If he was known to have abused alcohol and was given a prescription for Tylenol with codeine that would make a good malpractice case. But it could also be a convenient way to cover up a murder.
Topics: anthrax | No Comments »
« Previous Entries Next Entries »